Writing

2022

• Witten K, Macmillan A, Mackie H, van der Werf B, Smith M, Field A, Woodward A, Hosking J. Te Ara Mua – Future Streets: Can a streetscape upgrade designed to increase active travel change residents’ perceptions of neighbourhood safety? Wellbeing, Space and Society. 2022 (3).

2021

• Gamble, J., McKegg, K., & Cabaj, M. (2021). A Developmental Evaluation Companion, Canada: McConnell Foundation. 
• King, J. (2021). Expanding theory-based evaluation: incorporating value creation in a theory of change. Evaluation and Program Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101963.
• Mackie, H., Hirsch, L., Thorne, R., Witten, K., & Field A. (2021). Creating the Circuit Breakers: An Examination of the Sociotechnical System Factors Which Impede and Enable the Delivery of Safe and Healthy Neighbourhood Street Design in Aotearoa New Zealand. In S. Coxon, R. Napper (Eds.), Advancing a Design Approach to Enriching Public Mobility (1st ed., pp. 249-274). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
• Raerino, K., Macmillan, A., Field, A., & Hoskins, R. (2021). Local-Indigenous Autonomy and Community Streetscape Enhancement: Learnings from Māori and Te Ara Mua—Future Streets Project. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, 18 (3), 865; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030865 

2020

• Field, A. (2020). Survey fatigue and the tragedy of the commons: Are we undermining our evaluation practice? Evaluation Matters—He Take Tō Te Aromatawai, 6, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.18296/em.0054 
• Hawley, G., Macmillan, A., Field, A., Hodgson, R., Witten, K., Kearns, R.A., McKerchar, C. (2020). The normative influence of adults on youth access: Challenges and opportunities in the context of shifts away from car-dependence. Journal of Transport & Health, 16: 1-11
• Witten, K., Field, A. (2020). Engaging children in neighborhood planning for active travel infrastructure. In: Waygood O, Friman M, Olsson L, Mitra R. Transport and Children’s Wellbeing. Elsevier. 
• Oakden, J., Walton, M., & Foote, J. (2020). Contracting public health and social services: insights from complexity theory for Aotearoa New Zealand. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online. https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2020.1822422

2019

• Mackie, H., Woodward, A., Witten, K., Smith, M., Field, A., Macmillan, A., Hosking, J., Baas, P., Hawley, G., Wild, K., Hirsch, L., Hodgson, R. (2019). Healthy Future Mobility Synthesis Report. Mackie Research and Consulting.
• McKegg, K. (2019). White Privilege and the Decolonization Work Needed in Evaluation to Support Indigenous Sovereignty and Self-Determination. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 34(2), 357–367
• King, J. (2019). Evaluation and Value for Money: Development of an approach using explicit evaluative reasoning. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Melbourne. 
• King, J. (2019). Combining multiple approaches to valuing in the MUVA female economic empowerment program. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 19(4), 217–225.

2018

• Field, A., Wild, K., Woodward, A., Macmillan, A., Mackie, H. (2018). Encountering bikelash: Experiences and lessons from New Zealand communities. Journal of Transport & Health 11, 130-40
• Mackie, H., Macmillan, A., Witten, K., Baas, P., Field, A., Smith, M., Hosking, J., King, K., Sosene, L., Woodward, A. (2018). Te Ara Mua - Future Streets suburban street retrofit: A researcher-community-government co-design process and intervention outcomes. Journal of Transport & Health, 11, 209-220. 
• Macmillan, A.K., Mackie, H., Hosking, J.E., Witten, K., Smith, M., Field, A., Woodward, A., Hoskins, R., Stewart, J., van der Werf, B., Baas, P. (2018). Controlled before-after intervention study of suburb-wide street changes to increase walking and cycling: Te Ara Mua-Future Streets study design. BMC Public Health. (2018) 18,850 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5758-1 
• McKegg, K., Oakden, J., Wehipeihana, N., King, J. (2018). Evaluation Building Blocks: A Guide. Raglan, New Zealand: The Kinnect Group.
• Oakden, J., & King, J. (2018). Evaluation. In M. Tolich & C. Davidson (Eds.), Social science research in New Zealand: An introduction (3rd ed., pp. 180–193). Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland University Press.
• King, J., Allen, S. (2018). Applying evaluative thinking to value for money: the Pakistan Sub-national Governance Programme. Evaluation Matters – He Take Tō Te Aromatawai 4:2018 
• Wehipeihana, N., & McKegg, K. (2018). Values and Culture in Evaluative Thinking: Insights from Aotearoa New Zealand. New Directions for Evaluation, 2018 (158):93–107. 10.1002/ev.20320.
• Witten, K., Mackie, H., Baas, P., Macmillan, A., Woodward, A., Smith, M., Hosking, J., Field, A. (2017). Te Ara Mua - Future Streets: An Encounter with Business-As-Usual Transport Planning. Journal of Transport & Health 5, S51-S52

2017

• Appleton-Dyer, S., Field, A. (2017). Accountability and development? Supporting provider-led evaluation of short-term community social change projects. Evaluation Matters - He Take Tō Te Aromatawai. 3, 100-129. https://doi.org/10.18296/em.0018  
• Smith, M., Hosking, J., Woodward, A., Witten, K., Macmillan, A., Field, A., Baas, P., Mackie, H. (2017). Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 14,158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9  
• Wild, K., Woodward, A., Field, A., Macmillan, A. (2017). Beyond ‘bikelash’: engaging with community opposition to cycle lanes. Mobilities. 13(4), 505-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2017.1408950 
• Sullivan, C., Ong S-W., & McRae, R. (2017). Justice Sector Seriousness Score (2016 update): FAQs. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Justice.

2016

• Eoyang, G., & Oakden, J. (2016). Adaptive evaluation: Synergy between complexity theory and evaluation practice. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 18(3–4). doi:10.emerg/10.17357.e5389f5715a734817dfbeaf25ab335e5.
• King, J. (2016). Using Economic Methods Evaluatively. American Journal of Evaluation. April 29, 2016
• King, J. & Guimaraes, L. (2016). Evaluating value for Money in international development: the Ligada female economic empowerment programme. Evaluation Matters, Third quarter, 2016. Africa Development Bank
• Sullivan, C. (2016). Justice and the IDI: Initial uses, future plans, and the importance of collaboration. Presentation to symposium at MSD in Wellington (Using Integrated Data for Social Sector Policy and Practice).

2015

• McKegg, K., Wehipeihana, N., Becroft, M., & Gill, J. (2015). Developmental Evaluation’s Role in Supporting Community-Led Solutions for Māori and Pacific Young People’s Educational Success: The ASB Community Trust Māori and Pacific Education Initiative. In Patton, M.Q., McKegg, K., & Wehipeihana, N. (Eds.), Developmental Evaluation Exemplars: Principles in Practice (pp. 125–142). New York: Guilford Press
• Morris, M. & Sullivan, C. (2015). The impact of sentencing on adult offenders’ future employment and re-offending - community work versus fines. Wellington, New Zealand Treasury Working Paper 15/04
• Patton, M.Q., McKegg, K., & Wehipeihana, N. (2015). Developmental Evaluation Exemplars: Principles in Practice. New York: Guilford Press
• Wehipeihana, N., McKegg, K., Thompson, V., & Pipi, K. (2015). Cultural Responsiveness through Developmental Evaluation: Indigenous Innovations in Sport and Traditional Maori Recreation. In Patton, M.Q., McKegg, K., & Wehipeihana, N. (Eds.), Developmental Evaluation Exemplars: Principles in Practice (pp. 25–44). New York: Guilford Press

2014

• McKegg, K. (2014). White privilege: The flipside of inequality, Evaluation Connections, European Evaluation Society, July, pp 6–7
• Wehipeihana, N., Bailey, R., Davidson, E.J., & McKegg, K. (2014). Evaluator Competencies: The Aotearoa New Zealand Experience. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 28(3), 49–69.
• Wehipeihana, N., Kennedy, V., Pipi, K., & Paipa, K. (2014). Hinerauwhāriki: The Collective Higher Education Experiences of Four Māori Women in F, Cram, Phillips, H, Sauni, P, & Tuagalu, C (Ed). Māori and Pasifika Higher Education Horizons (Diversity in Higher Education, Volume 15), (pp. 291–313). Emerald Group Publishing Limited 

2013

• King, J., McKegg, K., Oakden & Wehipeihana, N. (2013). Evaluative Rubrics: a Method for Surfacing Values and Improving the Credibility of Evaluation, Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 9 (21), 11–20.
• McKegg, K. (2013). Evaluation Responsibility and Leadership in the Face of Failing Democracies, American Journal of Evaluation, 34(4), 579–582.
• Oakden, J. (2013). Evaluation rubrics: how to ensure transparency and clear assessment that respects diverse lines of evidence. Oakden, J. Melbourne. Retrieved from http://betterevaluation.org/
• Wehipeihana, N., Pipi, K., Kennedy, V., & Paipa, K. (2013). Hinerauwhāriki: Tapestries of Life for Four Māori Women in Evaluation, in Indigenous Pathways into Social Research: Voices of a New Generation, Mertens, D. M. Cram, F & Chilisa, B. (eds). Walnut Hills, CA: Left Coast Press.

2012

2011

• McKegg, K. (2011). Using Evaluative Inquiry to Generate Useful, High-quality Knowledge about the Quality and Value of Community Initiatives, in Knowledge Translation in Context: indigenous, policy, and community settings, Bannister, E., Leadbeater, B., Marshall, A., & Reicken, T. (eds). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

2010

• McAlevey, L., & Sullivan, C. (2010). Statistical literacy and sample survey results. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 41(7), 911-920. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073... 
• Wehipeihana, N., Davidson, J., McKegg, K., and Shankar, V. (2010). What Does it Take to do Evaluation in Communities and Cultural Contexts Other Than Our Own? Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, (6)13,182–192.